Re: There we go
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:28 am
I dig it. I use it almost everyday. I want to buy this griddle attachment which will give me a flat surface to grill things on.
Page 177 of 292
Re: There we go
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 11:55 am
She's probably one of the "Sisters" and looks to be an important inquisitor yes, but they're all gone by the time of A new hope.Digital Masta wrote: ↑Mon Mar 14, 2022 12:26 am
Meaning the show will focus a lot on her as opposed to Obi-Wan just like Boba Fett focused not so much on Boba but more on Fenix and Mando from the Mandalorian (so I've been told). I didn't watch Boba but heard about how it was basically the Mandalorian season 2.5.
She is featured in the short trailer more than Obi-Wan seems to be. But like I said, don't know how true that is.
I don't see her being featured beyond pursuing Obi-wan and then either dying or disappearing at the end.
Re: There we go
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2022 8:28 pm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XflisXO5mIQ
So I don't listen to Ben's podcast on the regular anymore, but the one thing he does better than most on the left and the right is create this forum for honest conversations. Confrontational and adversarial debates/discussions are essentially just in-person message board exchanges(and we all know how quickly - and inevitably - those devolve into pugilistic posturing.
This is my kind of content.
So I don't listen to Ben's podcast on the regular anymore, but the one thing he does better than most on the left and the right is create this forum for honest conversations. Confrontational and adversarial debates/discussions are essentially just in-person message board exchanges(and we all know how quickly - and inevitably - those devolve into pugilistic posturing.
This is my kind of content.
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 2:10 am
R.I.P Razor Ramon
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 2:05 pm
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:26 pm
I don't recognize the name.. But assume it's a comic book character or a wrestler
.. The alliteration
Edit
Buying houses via a mortgage is for the birds
.. Never doing this bullshit again
.. The alliteration
Edit
Buying houses via a mortgage is for the birds
.. Never doing this bullshit again
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 6:46 pm
You must be joking. Bad ass wrestlerkillacross wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 4:26 pm I don't recognize the name.. But assume it's a comic book character or a wrestler
.. The alliteration
Edit
Buying houses via a mortgage is for the birds
.. Never doing this bullshit again
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:00 pm
I Googled after the post
.. Still don't recognize him.. But assumed based on DMs post
.. Still don't recognize him.. But assumed based on DMs post
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:35 pm
RAZOR'S EDGE, BABY!killacross wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:00 pm I Googled after the post
.. Still don't recognize him.. But assumed based on DMs post
It is sad that pro wrestlers seem to die relatively young. I'm talking between 40s early 70s.
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:40 pm
I thought the same
.. But they are giants
How many 80 year olds do you know that are 6'5"+?
.. But they are giants
How many 80 year olds do you know that are 6'5"+?
Re: There we go
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:44 pm
True, they also don't have the healthiest lifestyles. It's rough, the film The Wrestler is a great look at what it is really like for a lot of them.killacross wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:40 pm I thought the same
.. But they are giants
How many 80 year olds do you know that are 6'5"+?
https://youtu.be/dZbZoNW80oU
Ms. Marvel TV show trailer
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. They definitely going for some Disney channel type shit. This character was made around 10 years ago for diversity reasons and was never interesting and her powers less so. Her powers were so bad that in the show they are replacing them with essentially Quasar's powers.
Trash.
Re: There we go
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:05 am
Already 8x more likeable than Brie Larson thoDigital Masta wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:44 pm
True, they also don't have the healthiest lifestyles. It's rough, the film The Wrestler is a great look at what it is really like for a lot of them.
https://youtu.be/dZbZoNW80oU
Ms. Marvel TV show trailer
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. They definitely going for some Disney channel type shit. This character was made around 10 years ago for diversity reasons and was never interesting and her powers less so. Her powers were so bad that in the show they are replacing them with essentially Quasar's powers.
Trash.
... I'll take it
Re: There we go
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:09 am
killacross wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 12:05 amAlready 8x more likeable than Brie Larson thoDigital Masta wrote: ↑Tue Mar 15, 2022 11:44 pm
True, they also don't have the healthiest lifestyles. It's rough, the film The Wrestler is a great look at what it is really like for a lot of them.
https://youtu.be/dZbZoNW80oU
Ms. Marvel TV show trailer
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. They definitely going for some Disney channel type shit. This character was made around 10 years ago for diversity reasons and was never interesting and her powers less so. Her powers were so bad that in the show they are replacing them with essentially Quasar's powers.
Trash.
... I'll take it
Some background on the Neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine.
https://scotthorton.org/interviews/3-8- ... n-ukraine/
Now, Marc Lamont Hill is a certified clown BUT he is right in this video
https://youtu.be/Zna1r0rpr8A
HOWEVER, his reasoning behind why is just him being a complete clown again. It's not because of white supremacy, it's because of where the regime's interests lie. Russia is pegged and has always been pegged as the number one enemy for decades at this point. This supports the goals of the regime and as such, it is full-on Russia is the worst. We can't have people looking into the US government supporting the destruction of Yemen so nobody talks about it.
We are screwing over Russians worldwide that have nothing to do with the acts of their government. Russian businesses are being targeted. I heard something about there being some Canadian kids sports league that won't allow Russia kids to be drafted or something like that, the Montreal orchestra canceled this genius pianist, Russian cats being banned from competitions which is the ultimate in stupidity. Imagine if this were Muslims?
How many Russians in Russia are banned from using so many interconnected services now? I get it but these things never work as intended, they don't cause the people to revolt and drop the leader, if anything it can act like a rallying cry to the cause.
Some Yemen background stuff.
https://scotthorton.org/interviews/3-12 ... onvention/
Re: There we go
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 1:57 am
Just check out the Pro-Russian side on Telegram or RT News app.
Re: There we go
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:05 am
Re: There we go
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:18 am
I meant by getting their side and perspective, it takes two to tango. There is a lot of history and reasoning (I don't condone these attacks) behind these attacks. President Putin didn't just randomly feel like invading Ukraine. They call it liberating as 1/7 are ethnic Russian and 1/3 speak the language. Neo-Nazi (far right in Ukraine) has been killing the Russian Ukrainians for 8 years. The U.S has been meddling in the Government, the US is cooking God knows what kind of bio/chemical weapons and then tried to lie about it. China Foreign Minister is blasting them publicly on the world stage, its embarrassing. If Ukraine joins NATO it's just a matter of when an article 5 will be used. It would take about 4 minutes to hit Moscow if NATO parked their missles in Ukraine. Like U.S and China, Russia is a superpower. Superpowers are gonna superpower.Digital Masta wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:05 amI'm not looking to be "pro-Russia" but I am pro "let's not kill everyone on Earth".
Re: There we go
Posted: Wed Mar 16, 2022 11:39 pm
There are always two sides of an issue, but they are not always co-equal let alone deserving of the same deference or scrutiny especially when caught between two diametrically opposed moral dilemmas. Scrutinizing Russia's imperial motives with the same moral deference as you would Ukraine's right to self-determination and survival, would be - on a not so extreme level - essentially the same as playing relativistic 4D chess with the Nazi invasion of Poland, or Al Qaeda's terrorist attack on 9/11. Investigating escalatory predicates, i.e."Why things happen" is all well and good, but unless you're a pure unadulterated fence sitter refusing to make a moral and ethical judgment (logically impossible) any exploration of the issue will inexorably be primed with your own values on the merits.
Essentially what all that word salad amounts to is this : The determination of right and wrong is inescapable, and it will ultimately inform your perspective and steer the discourse.
They call it "liberating" because despots have always relied upon the faithful corner-man of flowery/sugary language to justify their imperialist predilections. They themselves understand that even an unjustifiable act must be enshrouded in (at the bare minimum) facile reasoning to at least project the appearance of righteousness. But again, the value judgement one makes inevitably leads to a conclusion either for or against until ultimately the question is rendered moot(if one maintains steadfast conviction). This is especially true in situations that are nuanced in scope, but clear cut in resolution; Ukraine should win, Russia should lose.San Goku wrote: There is a lot of history and reasoning (I don't condone these attacks) behind these attacks. President Putin didn't just randomly feel like invading Ukraine. They call it liberating as 1/7 are ethnic Russian and 1/3 speak the language.
To put it in extremely simplified terms :Russia(or more specifically Putin and the Russian government) wants Ukraine for reasons wholly their own (Ukraine being a former Soviet Republic, the ancestral home of modern day Rus; pick your poison) and Ukraine equally endowed with their own reasons, wants to be independent and exercise their hard fought autonomy they spent decades establishing since the fall of the Soviet union.
Who's right? Who's wrong? Who should win?
I don't even know where to begin with the rest of this other than to say, Take a night off from Tucker San.San Goku wrote: Neo-Nazi (far right in Ukraine) has been killing the Russian Ukrainians for 8 years. The U.S has been meddling in the Government, the US is cooking God knows what kind of bio/chemical weapons and then tried to lie about it. China Foreign Minister is blasting them publicly on the world stage, its embarrassing. If Ukraine joins NATO it's just a matter of when an article 5 will be used. It would take about 4 minutes to hit Moscow if NATO parked their missles in Ukraine. Like U.S and China, Russia is a superpower. Superpowers are gonna superpower.
It's unfortunate, and in a perfect world it wouldn't happen, but - and not to be redundant - It's unfortunately entirely predictable and to be expected. You don't have to take my word for it, ask any Iraqi and Afghani who came to maturity post 2001, they could tell you all about it (i've worked with a few of them myself back when I did seasonal stints for Amazon).Digital Masta wrote:We are screwing over Russians worldwide that have nothing to do with the acts of their government. Russian businesses are being targeted. I heard something about there being some Canadian kids sports league that won't allow Russia kids to be drafted or something like that, the Montreal orchestra canceled this genius pianist, Russian cats being banned from competitions which is the ultimate in stupidity. Imagine if this were Muslims?
How many Russians in Russia are banned from using so many interconnected services now? I get it but these things never work as intended, they don't cause the people to revolt and drop the leader, if anything it can act like a rallying cry to the cause.
Innocents are always collaterally swept into acts of retaliation when the target is the head of state, or organizations that exercise considerable hegemonic control and authority over geographic regions.
This case is unique in that Putin has unified the entire world against him, so Russians are feeling the hurt from all sides; plenty of which is ridiculous and entirely punitive but again, not surprising.
Re: There we go
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 12:05 am
Pro-Russian media is just more propaganda but from the Russian side.San Goku wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:18 amI meant by getting their side and perspective, it takes two to tango. There is a lot of history and reasoning (I don't condone these attacks) behind these attacks. President Putin didn't just randomly feel like invading Ukraine. They call it liberating as 1/7 are ethnic Russian and 1/3 speak the language. Neo-Nazi (far right in Ukraine) has been killing the Russian Ukrainians for 8 years. The U.S has been meddling in the Government, the US is cooking God knows what kind of bio/chemical weapons and then tried to lie about it. China Foreign Minister is blasting them publicly on the world stage, its embarrassing. If Ukraine joins NATO it's just a matter of when an article 5 will be used. It would take about 4 minutes to hit Moscow if NATO parked their missles in Ukraine. Like U.S and China, Russia is a superpower. Superpowers are gonna superpower.Digital Masta wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 3:05 amI'm not looking to be "pro-Russia" but I am pro "let's not kill everyone on Earth".
I highly recommend listening to Scott Horton's latest speech on Yemen and Ukraine. Listen at 2X speed if you must (I do)
https://scotthorton.org/interviews/3-12 ... onvention/
Scott is as anti-war, anti-government, anti-police, anti-marginalized people but pro-American (the people) as it gets, you'd think he were a raging leftist but he's not (he's a libertarian more towards the anarchist bend) and is one of the best on foreign policy. He has made it his lifeblood for years and years and in that effort he constantly includes people both on the left and right that he doesn't agree with but share in his goals related to anti-war and the like.
Re: There we go
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 3:24 am
@Cane Take the night off Tucker, LmfaoCane_The9lives wrote: ↑Wed Mar 16, 2022 11:39 pmThere are always two sides of an issue, but they are not always co-equal let alone deserving of the same deference or scrutiny especially when caught between two diametrically opposed moral dilemmas. Scrutinizing Russia's imperial motives with the same moral deference as you would Ukraine's right to self-determination and survival, would be - on a not so extreme level - essentially the same as playing relativistic 4D chess with the Nazi invasion of Poland, or Al Qaeda's terrorist attack on 9/11. Investigating escalatory predicates, i.e."Why things happen" is all well and good, but unless you're a pure unadulterated fence sitter refusing to make a moral and ethical judgment (logically impossible) any exploration of the issue will inexorably be primed with your own values on the merits.
Essentially what all that word salad amounts to is this : The determination of right and wrong is inescapable, and it will ultimately inform your perspective and steer the discourse.
They call it "liberating" because despots have always relied upon the faithful corner-man of flowery/sugary language to justify their imperialist predilections. They themselves understand that even an unjustifiable act must be enshrouded in (at the bare minimum) facile reasoning to at least project the appearance of righteousness. But again, the value judgement one makes inevitably leads to a conclusion either for or against until ultimately the question is rendered moot(if one maintains steadfast conviction). This is especially true in situations that are nuanced in scope, but clear cut in resolution; Ukraine should win, Russia should lose.San Goku wrote: There is a lot of history and reasoning (I don't condone these attacks) behind these attacks. President Putin didn't just randomly feel like invading Ukraine. They call it liberating as 1/7 are ethnic Russian and 1/3 speak the language.
To put it in extremely simplified terms :Russia(or more specifically Putin and the Russian government) wants Ukraine for reasons wholly their own (Ukraine being a former Soviet Republic, the ancestral home of modern day Rus; pick your poison) and Ukraine equally endowed with their own reasons, wants to be independent and exercise their hard fought autonomy they spent decades establishing since the fall of the Soviet union.
Who's right? Who's wrong? Who should win?
I don't even know where to begin with the rest of this other than to say, Take a night off from Tucker San.San Goku wrote: Neo-Nazi (far right in Ukraine) has been killing the Russian Ukrainians for 8 years. The U.S has been meddling in the Government, the US is cooking God knows what kind of bio/chemical weapons and then tried to lie about it. China Foreign Minister is blasting them publicly on the world stage, its embarrassing. If Ukraine joins NATO it's just a matter of when an article 5 will be used. It would take about 4 minutes to hit Moscow if NATO parked their missles in Ukraine. Like U.S and China, Russia is a superpower. Superpowers are gonna superpower.
It's unfortunate, and in a perfect world it wouldn't happen, but - and not to be redundant - It's unfortunately entirely predictable and to be expected. You don't have to take my word for it, ask any Iraqi and Afghani who came to maturity post 2001, they could tell you all about it (i've worked with a few of them myself back when I did seasonal stints for Amazon).Digital Masta wrote:We are screwing over Russians worldwide that have nothing to do with the acts of their government. Russian businesses are being targeted. I heard something about there being some Canadian kids sports league that won't allow Russia kids to be drafted or something like that, the Montreal orchestra canceled this genius pianist, Russian cats being banned from competitions which is the ultimate in stupidity. Imagine if this were Muslims?
How many Russians in Russia are banned from using so many interconnected services now? I get it but these things never work as intended, they don't cause the people to revolt and drop the leader, if anything it can act like a rallying cry to the cause.
Innocents are always collaterally swept into acts of retaliation when the target is the head of state, or organizations that exercise considerable hegemonic control and authority over geographic regions.
This case is unique in that Putin has unified the entire world against him, so Russians are feeling the hurt from all sides; plenty of which is ridiculous and entirely punitive but again, not surprising.
Link with Foreign Minister: https://youtu.be/irQnlLo9l1U
How about you take a night and watch world news? You can't make this shit up. Moral high ground is lost completely.
Another recent link on Foreign Minister: https://youtu.be/UVtiEZ_duCU
Freaking embarrassing, what makes it worst is the Western media is dismissing or trying their best not to make it a big deal, it fucking is a big deal.
Just for fun check out the Candace Owen's recent talk about her experience on the bio weapons lab. I don't have the link, and I know it's Candace but she caught the US state department lying to her face with proof.
Don't get me started on the Ukraine President, out of respect for the pro Ukrainian side I won't. I do recognize them as a sovereign state (that's all I knew them to be in my life time). I agree with their right to fight for their freedom and HOLD THE LINE. That's what the Canadian Truckers freedom convoy tried to do before the hypocrite and pussy PM Justin Trudeau illegally envoked war powers to supress his own people, then flew to Europe to make photo ops.
Re: There we go
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 4:10 am
Jussie IS OUT!
I guess now in more ways than one.
*drum sound*
Regarding the labs, now do the labs exist? Yes, they do. Are they for weapons? Apparently not.
I guess now in more ways than one.
*drum sound*
Regarding the labs, now do the labs exist? Yes, they do. Are they for weapons? Apparently not.